US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 30,997
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Aubrey v. Fry et al
as 0:2024cv60701
Plaintiff:
Steven Benton Aubrey
Defendant:
John D Fry, Brian D Fillingim and Glen A Fitzmartin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caplan v. Best Auto Deal N Drive LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60690
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Best Auto Deal N Drive LLC and Sarg Financial, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
