US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,579
TAYLOR v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS TAYLOR
Respondent:
MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. SHAW
as 5:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
JARED RANDALL CARTER
Respondent:
JASON SHAW and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCDANIEL v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
ECHO LINDSEY MCDANIEL
Respondent:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. DISMAS CHARITIES INC
as 5:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES INC and ASHELY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHEPARD v. GEORGIA
as 3:2023cv00110
Petitioner:
RODNEY SHEPARD
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. MCMILLEN
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MCMILLEN and WARDEN MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
HUGH ZACHARY WATSON
Respondent:
SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DILLS
as 5:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
TRACY M JONES
Respondent:
ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
