US District Court for the District of Idaho Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 982
Guion v. The United States
as 1:2021cv00235
Plaintiff:
Josephine Guion
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Baldwin v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00231
Defendant:
John/Jane Does I-X, DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee, et al. v. Kim, et al.
as 4:2021cv00227
Defendant:
Kim Kyung-Min and Cho Kwang Kim
Plaintiff:
Yong Ja Chung and Kang Ho Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adame v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2021cv00223
Defendant:
Does I-X and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jessica Adame
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Knight v. Bannock County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 4:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Clayton Dixon, Bannock County Sheriff's Office, J. Logan Curzon and others
Defendant:
John/Janes 1-10 Does, Jon M Everson, Lorin Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. United States of America, et al.
as 4:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Alan Hunter and United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe I; John Doe II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Rudeen-Fisher v. Koziatek
as 2:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kristina Rudeen-Fisher
Defendant:
David Francis Koziatek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vombaur et al v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Vombaur and Jason Vombaur
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheatley v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, William Cook Europe APS and others
Plaintiff:
Kristi R. Wheatley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rapp et al v. Fraley et al
as 4:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lynn Tidwell and Steve Rapp
Defendant:
Darlene H. Fraley and Tawney R Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
