US District Court for the District of Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 832
Byerly v. State of Idaho
as 1:2019cv00130
Respondent: State of Idaho, Christensen, Keith Yordy
Petitioner: Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helburn v. Yordy
as 1:2019cv00127
Respondent: Howard Yordy
Petitioner: Nathan Nicholas Helburn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Contreras v. Christianson
as 1:2019cv00098
Respondent: Jay Christianson
Petitioner: Jorge Contreras
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darling v. Canyon County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Respondent: City of Nampa Police Dept, Canyon County Jail
Petitioner: Timothy P Darling
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arellano v. State of Idaho
as 1:2019cv00086
Petitioner: Juan Manuel Arellano
Respondent: State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wisdom v. Barry
as 1:2019cv00052
Respondent: Wayman Barry
Petitioner: Ronald Wisdom
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Ramirez
as 1:2019cv00041
Respondent: Damirez
Petitioner: Richard Knight
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conerly v. State of Idaho et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00043
Petitioner: Detrick Curtis Conerly
Respondent: State of Idaho, Paran LLP
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Jerome County Detention Facility
as 1:2019cv00042
Petitioner: Malcolm D Hanson
Respondent: Jerome County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Transue v. Idaho Attorney General
as 1:2019cv00008
Petitioner: Bryce C Transue
Respondent: Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?