US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,096
Askew v. Vinyard
as 3:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Leonard Askew
Defendant:
Christine Vinyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eiskant v. Polley et al
as 3:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
James Eiskant
Defendant:
Cecil Polley, David Brownback, . Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Stark et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
. Stark, Kristie Hart, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Brian Johnson, Kristie Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Janar Parks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ngang v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Edith Ngang
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hanks v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hanks
Defendant:
Kathy Ashcraft, Brittany Greene, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Wurster et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
James E Fuller
Defendant:
. Wurster, Tessa Derby, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
