Northern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 3,006
Shah v. Hartman
as 1:2018cv07990
Petitioner: Vivek Shah
Respondent: Richard Hartman
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wynter v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2018cv07987
Petitioner: David Wynter
Respondent: Walter Nicholson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tichy v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2018cv50383
Respondent: Kirsten Nielsen, Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Ricardo Wong and others
Petitioner: Bela Tichy
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Early v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv07896
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Glenn H. Early
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dillard v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv07780
Respondent: Illinois Department Of Corrections, State of Illinois, Jacqueline Lashbrook
Petitioner: Jerrel Dillard
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osei v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2018cv07723
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: Isaac Osei
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Haywood v. Swalls et al
as 1:2018cv07549
Petitioner: Christopher Haywood
Respondent: Matthew Swalls
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv07559
Petitioner: William Atkins
Respondent: Jacqueline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leija-Sanchez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv07546
Petitioner: Manuel Leija-Sanchez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
James v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2018cv07687
Respondent: Cook County, Illinois, Kimberly M. Foxx
Petitioner: Najee Devonte James
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?