US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,888
Ware-Mustapha v. Counselor Brown
as 1:2023cv15387
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
Counselor Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Poston v. Stempinski et al
as 1:2023cv15430
Petitioner:
Malik Poston
Respondent:
Rich Stempenski and Rich Stempinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haynes v. Wills
as 1:2023cv15338
Petitioner:
Gregory Haynes
Respondent:
Warden Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Golon-Valenzuela v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50385
Petitioner:
Francisco R. Golan-Valenzuela and Francisco R. Golon-Valenzuela
Respondent:
ICE, DHS and Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ibarra-Medina v. Warden of USP Thomson
as 1:2023cv15066
Petitioner:
Ibarra Medina Armando and Armando Ibarra-Medina
Respondent:
Warden of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Delcid v. Maldonado
as 3:2023cv50378
Petitioner:
Jose Fredy Delcid
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv50367
Petitioner:
Tracy E. Johnson
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delcid v. Maldonado
as 1:2023cv14926
Petitioner:
Jose Fredy Celcid and Jose Fredy Delcid
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Galvan-Marcelo v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50365
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Galvan-Marcelo
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Soto v. Maldonado
as 3:2023cv50362
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Soto and Marcos Alvarez Lopez
Respondent:
R Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
