US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 467
BELL v. POWELL et al
as 1:2016cv02491
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
MIDWEST REGIONAL NETWORK FOR INTERVENTION WITH SEX OFFENDERS and DAVID N POWELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. KD&R ENTERPRISES LLC et al.
as 1:2016cv02480
Defendant:
DENICE BENEFIEL, RYAN CROMER, KD&R ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., ESCATAWPA SONGS, DENNIS LINDE LEGACY and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. PURDUE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2016cv02488
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. EAST COAST HEALTH INSURANCE, INC.
as 1:2016cv02482
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
EAST COAST HEALTH INSURANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY
as 1:2016cv02463
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. A PLACE FOR MOM, INC.
as 1:2016cv02451
Defendant:
A PLACE FOR MOM, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. TIPTON
as 1:2016cv02436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
DAVE TIPTON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. BUCKLEY
as 1:2016cv02434
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
KEITH BUCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. AURORA WORLDWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
as 1:2016cv02352
Defendant:
AURORA WORLDWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. ARAMARK CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv02291
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
