US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 2,168
DENNIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02493
Plaintiff:
ANOLA DENNIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KING v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
SETH KING
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PFEIL v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
DOREIN C. PFEIL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOOVER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02419
Plaintiff:
TAWN LINDA HOOVER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02388
Plaintiff:
SABRINA SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MATTHEWS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02389
Plaintiff:
ANGELA R. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DRAPER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02384
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DRAPER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BYBEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02362
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY J. BYBEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
LEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
ADELEYE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02303
Plaintiff:
VIRGILENE ADELEYE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
