US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,366
Campbell v. Collins
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Lee Marcell Campbell
Defendant:
Director Jerry Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlow v. Boyce et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Terrell E. Whitlow
Defendant:
Jennifer Boyce, David Fernandez, Beth Lessey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musarra v. Lane et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Musarra
Defendant:
Time Lane, Liggett Morris, Green River Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Heather Stewart
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Willet
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Officer Willet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Travis
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Weese et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Austin Weese, Jimmy Wilson, John Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Logan County et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Logan County, Christphor Michael Trimmer, Juana Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Nurse Provider Leesia Smith, Ken Claud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
