US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 185
Scott v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv04815
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Scott
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2017cv03980
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Smith
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hayes v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv03841
Plaintiff:
Michele I. Hayes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Clark v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv02821
Plaintiff:
Peggy Jean Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Foreman v. Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans
as 2:2017cv01404
Plaintiff:
Joe Foreman
Defendant:
Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Liebold, et al v. Alabama Great Southern Railway Company, et al.
as 2:2017cv00815
Defendant:
Alabama Great Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Ruth Liebold and Dan Liebold
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Mayes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv16149
Plaintiff:
Rosie Mayes
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Brown v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv16157
Plaintiff:
Shinnah Brown
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
McDonald v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2016cv15975
Plaintiff:
Sharon McDonald
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Sullivan v. Davidson Trucking Inc, et al
as 2:2016cv15847
Plaintiff:
Donald Ryan Sullivan
Defendant:
Davidson Trucking, Inc. , Travelers Casualty Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
