US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Torts - Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 150
Calix v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2010cv00676
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Calix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
J M Test Systems, Inc. v. Capital One, N.A.
as 3:2009cv01112
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stupp Bros Inc v. H.A. Logistics
as 3:2009cv00882
Plaintiff:
Stupp Bros Inc, Stupp Bros Inc, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant:
H.A. Logistics
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Thomas et al v. PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.
as 3:2009cv00807
Plaintiff:
John Thomas, Cherry R Thomas, Thomas Kimberly and others
Defendant:
PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fenet v. Bargas
as 3:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Fenet
Defendant:
Valerie Briggs Bargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hollingsworth v Chaparral Boats, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
G. Michael Hollingsworth and G. Michael Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Chaparral Boats, Inc and Chaparral Boats, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
The Dow Chemical Company v. Nolan Power Group, LLC
as 3:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
The Dow Chemical Company, The Dow Chemical Company and The Dow Chemical Company
Defendant:
Nolan Power Group, LLC and Nolan Power Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Young, I v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00783
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Young, I
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2008cv00611
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Cleopatra Dunn
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Senax, Inc. v. Jumonville
as 3:2008cv00307
Plaintiff:
Senax, Inc. and Senax, Inc.
Defendant:
Claude Coulon Jumonville
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
