US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,975
Sneed v. Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Sneed
Defendant:
Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections, Francis M Abbott, Chairperson Sheryl M. Ranatza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Marion Taylor
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Higginbotham
as 3:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ja'uan T. Swanson
Defendant:
Beau Higginbotham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darville v. Verdigets
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Donovan Darville
Defendant:
Jason Verdigets and Leila Braswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Ira Jerome Ross
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Landry
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Miller
Defendant:
Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betz v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Rodrick S. Betz
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Tim Unknown and T. Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. Cordera/Galleria Mall Corp et al
as 3:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Cordera/Galleria Mall Corp, Jacob the Jeweler, David Cordini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaisance v. Town
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Reese Michael Plaisance
Defendant:
A. Hayes Town, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. South America (Bogota Columbia) et al
as 3:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
South America (Bogota Columbia), Gutenburg Pressing Company (Mainz, Germany), Regional Center Neubrenneplate (Mainz,Germany) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
