US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 121
United States of America v. Deibel
as 4:2008cv40055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert E. Deibel
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Theodore J. Katsiroubas & Sons, Inc. v. Toland
as 1:2008cv10545
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Katsiroubas & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Sean P. Toland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Chase
as 1:2008cv10540
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Justin P. Chase
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Dodge
as 3:2008cv30056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dodge
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Bartke
as 1:2008cv10455
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard J. Bartke
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Bounty Fresh, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv10449
Plaintiff:
Bounty Fresh, LLC and Bounty Fresh, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
United States of America v. Gralinski, Jr.
as 3:2008cv30053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edward J. Gralinski, Jr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Quail World, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv12090
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Quail World, Inc. and Chankhan Chhuon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Mohawk Orchards, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv30214
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mohawk Orchards, Inc., Barry D. Wiles and Gregory G. Wiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Peter Condakes Company, Inc. et al v. Murphy's Fruit, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv11990
Plaintiff:
Peter Condakes Company, Inc. and B.C. Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Muprhy's Fruit, Inc., NPL Enterprises, Inc., Nicholas Lembo and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
