US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,004
Johnson v. Services to Enhance Potential, Inc.
as 2:2023cv12234
Plaintiff:
Karen Johnson
Defendant:
Services to Enhance Potential, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conerly v. Great Lakes Wine & Spirits, LLC
as 4:2023cv12168
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Conerly
Defendant:
Great Lakes Wine & Spirits, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roseboro et al v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv11995
Plaintiff:
Brittany Roseboro and John Glover
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage, LLC, Quicken Loans, LLC and John Doe
Stoimenoff v. ManageAbility Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv11863
Plaintiff:
Gail Stoimenoff
Defendant:
ManageAbility Incorporated and FDI Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clarke v. ADCO Products Inc.
as 2:2023cv11648
Plaintiff:
Antwaine Clarke
Defendant:
ADCO Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gray v. Walbridge Aldinger LLC
as 4:2023cv11672
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gray
Defendant:
Walbridge Aldinger LLC
Crane et al v. McClaren Flint et al
as 4:2023cv11569
Plaintiff:
Marcia Crane and Brittney Lindsey
Defendant:
McClaren Flint and McClaren Healthcare Corp.
Barker et al v. STA Management, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11542
Plaintiff:
James Barker, Cheri Fritts and Aryn Delaney
Defendant:
STA Management, LLC, Amer Asmar, Northwest Professionals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kline et al v. Inyo, Inc.
as 2:2023cv11539
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kline, Jacob Gironza and Justine Sanchez
Defendant:
Inyo, Inc. and Inyo, Inc. Doing business as Inyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Temple v. Sector 7, LLC
as 2:2023cv11521
Plaintiff:
David Temple
Defendant:
Sector 7, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
