US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 255
Campbell et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
Susan Campbell and David Carl Campbell
Defendant:
Biomet Manufacturing Corp., Biomet US Reconstruction, LLC, Biomet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00866
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. James and Susan James
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blank v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries (USA), Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00123
Defendant:
Kawasaki Heavy Industries (USA), Inc., Kawasaki Motors Corporation USA and Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., USA
Plaintiff:
Michael Blank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lemieux v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2018cv00682
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Plaintiff:
Winnie Julianne Lemieux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leonard v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
David E. Leonard
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and Apex Tool Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wagner v. Zimmer, Incorporated
as 1:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Wagner
Defendant:
Zimmer, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lanius et al v. Rage Enterprises, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lanius and Heidi Lanius
Defendant:
Rage Enterprise, Inc. and Yueh Charng Enterprises Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sumner v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
as 1:2018cv00306
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sumner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bruinsma v. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bruinsma
Defendant:
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. , Watts Regulator Co. and Ames Fire & Waterworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stama v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Nick T. Stama
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
