US District Court for the District of North Dakota Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Right Choice Electric Inc. v. P&E Automation, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Right Choice Electric Inc.
Defendant:
P&E Automation, Inc. and CNA Surety
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America v. Alutiiq International Solutions LLC
as 4:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alutiiq International Solutions LLC and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America v. Alutiiq International Solutions LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alutiiq International Solutions LLC and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
TEK Industries, LLC v. Smith-Root, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
TEK Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Smith-Root, Inc., Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and Insco Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Lockett Construction, Inc. v. Sundt Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
Lockett Construction, Inc. and Lockett Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Sundt Construction, Inc., Sundt Construction, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Baker v. Holmes & Narver Constructors, Inc. et al
as 2:2006cv00029
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Diversified Builders Inc v. Weis Builders Inc et al
as 4:2005cv00131
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Lockett Construction v. Weis Builders Inc, et al
as 1:2005cv00109
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
VER-MAC Constr, et al v. Weis Builders Inc, et al
as 4:2005cv00070
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
USA, et al v. Swank Enterprises, et al
as 4:2005cv00004
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.