US District Court for the District of Nevada Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 231 - 240 of 596
Cox v. Benedetti et al
as 3:2010cv00129
Defendant:
Mary Babb, Bruce Bannister, James Benedetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trogdon v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2009cv01574
Plaintiff:
Glen Trogdon
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, (fnu) Rogin, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2009cv01333
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Franco
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, Anthony M. Scillia, R. Bannister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuvaas v. Correctional Medical Services
as 2:2009cv01033
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kuvaas
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddy v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2009cv01018
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eddy
Defendant:
Douglas Gillespie, Leroy Kirkeguard, Clark County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Holmes et al
as 2:2009cv00903
Plaintiff:
Rocky James
Defendant:
W. Holmes and S. Statler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2009cv00712
Plaintiff:
Steven Nelson
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, Robert LeGrand, Dr. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davitt v. Stephney et al
as 3:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael Davitt
Defendant:
Stephney, Atwood and Hunt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ward v. State of Nevada
as 3:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Frederick Louis Ward
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Sparks Police Department, Northern Nevada Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davitt v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Davitt
Defendant:
McDaniel, Debra Brooks and Renee Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
