US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 13,827
Hodge v. New York Unemployment
as 1:2024cv01631
Plaintiff:
David Hodge
Defendant:
New York Unemployment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Ricky Francis
Defendant:
The City of New York and NYPD Officers John Does, 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Shawn Randall Thomas
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Leroy Adam, Keechant Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hennings et al v. NYPD Commissioner et al
as 1:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Velyn Hennings
Defendant:
NYPD Commissioner, Stephen K Benjamin, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. The City of Long Beach
as 2:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Theresa Smith
Defendant:
The City of Long Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roberts v. Healthfirst
as 1:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Jazmine I Roberts
Defendant:
Healthfirst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. CVS et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Jazmine I Roberts
Defendant:
CVS and Yushan Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Passavia v. The County of Suffolk
as 2:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Christina Passavia
Defendant:
The County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Iacobelli v HPB/DOB City of New York
as 1:2024cv01458
Plaintiff:
George Iacobelli
Defendant:
HPB/DOB City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. NY Presbyterian Hospital, Queens et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Jazmine I Roberts
Defendant:
NY Presbyterian Hospital, Queens and Sarah S. Verma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
