US District Court for the Southern District of New York Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 347
United States of America v. Fridman
as 1:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Natalio Fridman
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5321
Sociedade Saboeira de NaCala v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv09889
Claimant:
Sociedade Saboeira de Nacala
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
McGown v. Brady et al
as 1:2017cv08397
Plaintiff:
James McGown
Defendant:
Edward T. Brady, Nancy Brady, Suzanne Brady Caroline Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States Of America v. Berkovic
as 7:2017cv08304
Defendant:
Walter Berkovic
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5321
United States Of America v. $149,949 in United States Currency
as 1:2017cv06617
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Any and All Roosters and Hens Seized on or about May 23, 2017 From 751 Whitney Road, Ontario, NY 14519 and any Progeny Thereof
as 1:2017cv05718
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Prashker
as 1:2017cv03896
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ron E. Prashker
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5321
Bastien v. Brenan
as 1:2017cv03431
Plaintiff:
Ernst Emmanuel Bastien
Defendant:
John Brenan and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $3,320,043.08 in United States Currency
as 1:2017cv02600
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$3,320,043.08 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $526,087.37 in United States Currency
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$526,087.37 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
