US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,241
Barnes v. Common Pleas Judges et al
as 1:2019cv00619
Respondent: App. Counsel, Counsel of Trial, Common Pleas Judges
Petitioner: Richard Barnes
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Mason et al
as 5:2019cv00597
Petitioner: Christopher Hill
Respondent: Josh Shapiro, John D. Ferrero, Superintendent Bernadette Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Sloan
as 4:2019cv00599
Petitioner: Nakyia D. Parker
Respondent: Warden Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Gray
as 1:2019cv00594
Respondent: Warden David W. Gray
Petitioner: Ronald Curry
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Wainwright
as 1:2019cv00552
Respondent: Warden Lyneal Wainwright
Petitioner: Damon Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hairston v. Eppinger
as 1:2019cv00554
Respondent: Warden LaShann Eppinger
Petitioner: Sam Willie Hairston, III
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pontefract v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00528
Defendant: Nick Fergunson, United States of America, Warden Steven Merlak
Plaintiff: Clyde Pontefract
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Yuschak v. Sheldon
as 1:2019cv00520
Petitioner: Terry M. Yuschak
Respondent: Warden Edward Sheldon
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv00518
Respondent: USA, Mark Williams
Petitioner: Terrence Matthews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waters v. Bowerman
as 1:2019cv00491
Respondent: Warden Sean Bowerman
Petitioner: Williams Waters, III
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?