US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 6,923
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Gentry et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Desmond Gentry, Pour LLC and Pour LLC doing business as Pour Lounge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Benson v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lynette Benson
Defendant:
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Misner v. Empire Auto Protect, LLC
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Brady Misner
Defendant:
Empire Auto Protect, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baker v. Line Financial, PBC
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Paula Baker
Defendant:
Line Financial, PBC doing business as Beem
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rider v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01730
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Forsburg v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Gerald Forsburg, Jenna Doctor, Luis Castro and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
