US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,923
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jane Doe (J.N.K.) v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (J.N.K.)
Defendant:
Mahadeva Madison Heights Holdings, LLC, Red Roof Inns, Inc., RRF Holding Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GMS Mine Repair & Maintenance Inc. v. Drivetrain
as 2:2023cv03413
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Ream v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
John Ream
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Secretary Janet Yellen, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Grant v. Ramaswamy
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grant
Defendant:
Vivek Ramaswamy
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
R.J. v. Adena Health System
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
R. J. and R.J.
Defendant:
Adena Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
R.J. v. Adena Health System
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
R.J.
Defendant:
Adena Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
