R.J. v. Adena Health System
R. J. and R.J. |
Adena Health System |
1:2024cv00025 |
January 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Matthew W McFarland |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: The Court, upon a review of the record, notes that the above-styled case was erroneously filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Cincinnati. Pursuant to S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 82.1(b), this case is hereby transferred from the docket of the Honorable Matthew W. McFarland to the Office of the Clerk for reassignment to the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 01/23/2024. (kaf) |
Intra District Transfer - Case transferred to Eastern Division at Columbus as case number 2:24-cv-282. This case has been closed and all future filings should be made in case number 2:24-cv-282. (kaf) Modified Docket Text on 1/24/2024 (bjc). |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (zmc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Plaintiff R. J. re #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List of Counsel) (Lyon, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Adena Health System ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9774299), filed by R. J.. (Lyon, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.