US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 476
United States of America v. Eight Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($8,425.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00346
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eight Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($8,425.00) in United States Currency and Kflegewerges Abate
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $24,485 (Twenty-Four Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars in United States Currency) et al
as 1:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$24,485 (Twenty-Four Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars in United States Currency), $5,390 (Five Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Dollars in United States Currency), $4,863 (Four Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty-Three Dollars in United States Currency) and others
Claimant:
Christopher Stegawski
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred Forty and 00/100 Dollars ($15,840.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00219
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred Forty and 00/100 Dollars ($15,840.00) in United States Currency, One Thousand Nine Hundred Eight-Two and 08/100 Dollars ($1,982.08) in United States Currency and One Thousand Seventy-Six and 00/100 Dollars ($1,076.00) in United States Currency
Movant:
Matthew Hughes
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 29,322.00 in United States Currency
as 3:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
29,322.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States Of America v. Thirty One Thousand One and 00.100 Dollars ($31,001.00) In U.S. Currency Et Al
as 2:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Nancy Peaks and Ullman Tyus
Defendant:
$31,001.00 and 2004 Chevrolet Silverado Vin 2GCEK 19V041172706
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Five Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($5,960.00) in United States Currency
as 2:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Five Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($5,960.00) in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP et al
as 2:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP, Sixteen (16) 650CC motorcycles Model WF650-T, Fifty (50) 163CC 5.5 HP gas powered 2800 watt electric generators, Model WF2800D and others
Claimant:
Snyder Computer Systems, Inc. and Wildfire Motors
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP et al
as 2:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP, Sixteen (16) 650CC motorcycles Model WF650-T, Fifty (50) 163CC 5.5 HP gas powered 2800 watt electric generators, Model WF2800D and others
Claimant:
Snyder Computer Systems, Inc. and Wildfire Motors
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $33,000 (Thirty-Three Thousand) in United States Currency et al
as 3:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$33,000 (Thirty-Three Thousand Dollars) in United States Currency and $5,000 (Five Thousand Dollars) In United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Account Contents of First Financial Acct 5403 in the name of Earl D Clark in the amount of 353211.91 et al
as 3:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Account Contents of First Financial Acct 5403 in the name of Earl D Clark in the amount of 353211.91, Account Contents of First Financial Acct 6659 in the name of Rachel Clark in the amount of 33388.14, 20000.00 in United States Currency and others
Claimant:
Earl D Clark and Rachel Clark
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
