US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 857
Green v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Anthony Ryan Green
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stevens v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butler v. Day
as 6:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jeremy Day
Respondent:
Jeremy Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Quick
as 6:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Byron Anderson
Counter Defendant:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butler v. Ledbetter
as 6:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logsdon v. Cassidy
as 6:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr.
Respondent:
Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mendenhall v Seminole Nation
as 6:2023cv00418
Petitioner:
Stoney Ray Mendenhall
Counter Defendant:
Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Hanson v. Davis
as 6:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Michael S. Hanson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Funk v. Rankins
as 6:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
