US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,708
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bordeau v. Dewey Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Benny Bordeau
Defendant:
Dewey Police Department and City of Dewey, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGill v. Ballard et al
as 4:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Samuel Curtis McGill, Jr
Defendant:
Matt Ballard, George Gibbs, Jr., Mary Leavell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gates et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Robert Gates, Rita Gates and Julio Melendez
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Samantha Ramsey, Don Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sanders v. TC Transcontinental Tulsa
as 4:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Sanders
Defendant:
TC Transcontinental Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
