US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,498
Cato v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Timothy Shawn Cato
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Guten et al
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
David Guten and Scott Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00380
Petitioner:
Eugene Todd Nunley
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weidenfelder v. White
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Sonia R Weidenfelder
Defendant:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wanjiku v. Boggess
as 4:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Erick Wanjiku
Respondent:
Gary Boggess and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v Regalado, et al
as 4:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Detention Officer Sgt Barbarinde, Detention Officer Sgt Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Sharp
as 4:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Stacey D Berry
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00355
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Parker
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanchard v. Garfield County Courthouse et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blanchard
Defendant:
Garfield County Courthouse, Kartina Matousek Ames, Judge Hladik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00342
Petitioner:
Ernest Clay Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
