US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,326
Sheikhuna v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Awes Sheikhuna
Defendant:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Villers
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
P. Villers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor, Schylar Flick and Dywane Russell Crum
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Eastern Oregon Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Polk County Jail
as 6:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Tolbert
Defendant:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassman v. Braun et al
as 6:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Glassman
Defendant:
Mark Braun, Bobbie France, Tina Lovik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Hapo Community Credit Union et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Paul Dawson
Defendant:
Hapo Community Credit Union and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Cheremonv et al
as 6:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Alexandra Cheremonv and Drake Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Massey et al
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Johnathan R. Black
Defendant:
Caprice Massey, Patrick Garrett, Seth Honl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Pope
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
Timothy Ray Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
