US District Court for the District of Oregon Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 326
USA v. $8,000 (US)
as 3:2019cv01296
Plaintiff:
USA and United States of America
Defendant:
$8,000 (US)
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $9,000 (US)
as 3:2019cv01197
Defendant:
$9,000 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $28,240.00 (US)
as 3:2019cv00662
Defendant:
$28,240.00 (US)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $23,760.00 (US)
as 6:2019cv00439
Defendant:
$23,760.00 (US)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $1,619,120.00 (US) et al
as 3:2019cv00358
Defendant:
$54,991.45 (US), $152,285.00 (US), $1,619,120.00 (US) and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $14,860.00 (US)
as 3:2019cv00300
Defendant:
$14,860.00 (US)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Isaiah Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $273,990.00 (US)
as 3:2019cv00249
Defendant:
$273,990.00 (US)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Steven Rijo and Michael Simon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Real Property at 300 Gaerky Creek Rd., et al
as 3:2019cv00235
Defendant:
1205 Pine Grove Road, Rogue River and Real Property at 300 Gaerky Creek Rd.
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Maryam Shafei and Ashland Hills Trust
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. $9,222.00 (US)
as 3:2019cv00221
Defendant:
$9,222.00 (US)
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2721 NE Conser Road, Albany, OR
as 6:2019cv00039
Defendant:
2721 NE Conser Road, Albany, OR
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Mark McKibbin
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
