US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,313
BASEHORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv03049
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN BASEHORE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MENDEZ v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02911
Plaintiff:
MARIANA MENDEZ
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mitchell v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02906
Plaintiff:
Estelle Mitchell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BEIL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv02936
Plaintiff:
JUDY BEIL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Soles v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Connor Donald Soles
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NALLY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02876
Plaintiff:
KIM K. NALLY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02886
Plaintiff:
SHENA CAROL JOHNSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCCOY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02825
Plaintiff:
DANIEL V MCCOY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCUDERI v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02551
Plaintiff:
NEIL ANGELO SCUDERI
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RODRIGUEZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
