US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 3,327
COLON v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
JERRY COLON
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, CITY OF LANCASTER, OFFICER JAY HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BROWN v. ZOTEK et al
as 2:2023cv01944
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant:
SHERIFF SGT. ZOTEK, DEPUTY SHERIFF AUSTIN and DEPUTY SHERIFF FYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGERNETTE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01880
Plaintiff:
ANGERNETTE JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DET. JAMES KOENIG, DET. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. DONATE et al
as 5:2023cv01877
Plaintiff:
SARAH JACKSON
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, JANINE DONATE, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. BROWNING
as 2:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
STAMAR RICHARD MILLER
Defendant:
ESQ. DEAN BROWNING and DEON BROWNING, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. WELLPATH
as 2:2023cv01682
Defendant:
WELLPATH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYSON v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
TIA TYSON
Defendant:
SHAUN DUFFY and MATTHEW P LALLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. NORDO
as 2:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ DIXON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DETECTIVE PHILIP NORDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNTER v. DR. SUNNY KAR et al
as 2:2023cv01630
Plaintiff:
TASHAWN K. HUNTER
Defendant:
DR. SUNNY KAR, KATHERINE KUMI-ATIEMO, KELLIE LEMLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deyo v. Eck et al
as 5:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Francis Deyo
Defendant:
Phillip R. Eck and Manor Township Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
