US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
E-Leather Limited v. Overman International Corporation
as 3:2012cv00490
Plaintiff:
E-Leather Limited
Defendant:
Overman International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aumund Corporation v. Tony Walker Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Aumund Corporation
Defendant:
Tony Walker Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Retro Television, Inc. v. Universal City Studios Productions LLLP
as 1:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Retro Television, Inc.
Defendant:
Universal City Studio Productions, LLLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vision Service Plan v. Shields et al
as 3:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Vision Service Plan
Defendant:
William Shields , Charles Shields and Shields & Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. Herndon et al
as 3:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Davidson
Defendant:
Jackie Herndon, Steve Hritz, Bill Stinnett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sign*A*Rama Inc.v Buquo, et.al.
as 1:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
Sign*A*Rama Inc., Sign*A*Rama Inc. and Sign*A*Rama Inc.
Defendant:
James Buquo and Sandra Buquo
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ESR Insurance Services Limited v. Clemons et al
as 4:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
ESR Insurance Services Limited, ESR Insurance Services Limited and ESR Insurance Services Limited
Defendant:
Wendell Clemons, Black Pearl Entertainment, Inc. and Manchester Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Murphy v. Zomber
as 1:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy and Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Michael Zomber and Michael Zomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ellis v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.
as 1:2006cv00179
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
United States of America v. New Vista Capital Fund, LP
as 3:2005mc00050
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 631 Small Business Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
