US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 518
Guthridge v. Beale Street Blues Company, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02189
Plaintiff:
Robert Guthridge
Defendant:
Beale Street Blues Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elam v. Zazzle Inc.
as 2:2020cv02167
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Elam
Defendant:
Zazzle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Fuse, LLC v. LIT Vodka, LLC
as 2:2020cv02163
Plaintiff:
Fuse, LLC
Defendant:
LIT Vodka, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Hill et al v. Beauregard et al
as 2:2020cv02148
Plaintiff:
Otis Zirker, Donell Barton, Jr., Lamario Starks and others
Defendant:
Malaco Inc, BMG Rights Management US, Paul Beauregard and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ryan and Rose, LLC v. Quintessential Tots, LLC
as 2:2020cv02149
Plaintiff:
Ryan and Rose, LLC
Defendant:
Quintessential Tots, LLC d/b/a Itzy Ritzy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Guthridge v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC
as 2:2020cv02137
Plaintiff:
Robert Guthridge
Defendant:
Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hunter Fan Company v. Landmark Technology A, LLC
as 2:2020cv02133
Plaintiff:
Hunter Fan Company
Defendant:
Landmark Technology A, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Best v. Visible Music College
as 2:2020cv02062
Plaintiff:
Abraham Best
Defendant:
Visible Music College
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
American Clothing Express, Inc. et al v. CloudFlare, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02007
Plaintiff:
American Clothing Express, Inc. and Justin Alexander, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-200 and CloudFlare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Memphis Shelby County Airport Authority
as 2:2019cv02786
Defendant:
Memphis Shelby County Airport Authority
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
