US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,180
McVay v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02259
Petitioner:
Michael McVay
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Seiber v. Clendenion
as 2:2023cv02262
Petitioner:
Travis Seiber
Respondent:
Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01074
Petitioner:
Devonta Curry
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tims v. Garland
as 2:2023cv02248
Petitioner:
William Tims
Respondent:
U.S.A. and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Morgan County Correctional Complex
as 2:2023cv02202
Petitioner:
Darin C. Woods
Respondent:
Morgan County Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denton v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02198
Petitioner:
Leon Denton
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02188
Petitioner:
Steven L. Hunter
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bricco v. State of TN
as 2:2023cv02161
Petitioner:
Michael L. Bricco
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Mays
as 1:2023cv01036
Petitioner:
Harold Allen Vaughn
Respondent:
Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of TN
as 2:2023cv02104
Petitioner:
Glenn Vernell Smith
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
