US District Court for the District of Utah Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ponce v. Brooksby et al
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Ponce
Defendant:
Nate Brooksby and FNU Johnson
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nuneviller v. Stash et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Sara Michelle Nuneviller
Defendant:
Stash and Apex Clearing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Murray City Police Department
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Janay Brooks
Defendant:
Murray City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardy v. D&D Management 2
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Arielle Hardy
Defendant:
D&D Management 2 LLC doing business as Elevated Coatings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Houlin v. Forsey
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Andrew Houlin
Defendant:
J. Forsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaveh et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Hossein Kaveh, Faranak Sedarat and Banou Afsar Sedarat
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
