US District Court for the District of Utah Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 4,208
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: City of Birmingham and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Gray
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: Robert Louis Brown
Defendant: Jeffrey S Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: County of Montgomery and Reese McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zoulek v. Christensen et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: Hannah Zoulek
Defendant: Jessica Christensen, Luann Cooper and Val Snow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lu v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Yan-Xu Lu
Defendant: Sean D. Reyes, Kyle J Kaiser, J Clifford Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tahi et al v. Granite School District
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff: Lata Tahi, Pelitisasa Tahi, Keith Leota and others
Defendant: Granite School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?