US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Hung v. Laphen et al
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
Che Wu Hung
Defendant:
Michael W. Laphen , Michael J. Mancuso , David J. Barram and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Elliott et al v. Reilly et al
as 1:2011cv00958
Plaintiff:
James Elliott and SiRRAN Communications Inc.
Defendant:
Brendan Reilly , SiRRAN Communications USA Inc., SiRRAN Communications LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Treppel v. Reason, et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Treppel
Defendant:
J. Paul Reason , David R. Goode , Michael D. Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins v. Crawford et al
as 3:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
William D. Perkins
Defendant:
James B. Crawford , Robert H. Foglesong , Richard M. Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mostaed v. Crawford et al
as 3:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mostaed
Defendant:
James B. Crawford , Robert H. Fogelsong , Richard M. Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott et al v. Great Point Partners, LLC
as 1:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
John Elliott and Laura Elliott
Defendant:
Great Point Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Great Point Partners, LLC v. Elliott
as 1:2010cv01019
Plaintiff:
Great Point Partners, LLC
Defendant:
John Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackrel v. ICX Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00941
Plaintiff:
Howard S. Jackrel
Defendant:
ICX Technologies, Inc., Hans C. Kobler, Colin J. Cumming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siegel v. Telos Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Siegel
Defendant:
Telos Corporation, Doe I - XX and ROE corporations I - XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meehan v. McKeon et al
as 1:2010cv00446
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Meehan
Defendant:
Robert McKeon, William Ballhaus, Barry McCaffrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
