US District Court for the District of Vermont Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 618
Johnson v. Russo
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Russo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Rushlow Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Rushlow Enterprises, Inc., Benjamin J. Cobb and Anthony M. Neddo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annis v. Federal Prosecutors State of Vermont et al
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant:
Federal Prosecutors State of Vermont, Tristram Coffin, Gregory L. Waples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Annis v. Wiggins Air Freight et al
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Willis Boyd Annis, III
Defendant:
Wiggins Air Freight, Steven Maynard, Patrick Nut Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. EmPRO
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
EmPRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Black River Apartments
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Black River Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Bitrategaming
as 2:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Bitrategaming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Bond, Schoeneck & King LLC, et al
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Bond, Schoeneck & King LLC, Kristian Stefanides and Andrea Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
