US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,507
Ritchie v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ann Ritchie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Olsen v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Olsen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Woodworth v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Frank Woodworth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riach v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Aaron Riach
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Brendan K Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Figueroa v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Alejandro O Figueroa
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Elmer Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gaze v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Teddy Gaze
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Estrada v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Renee Estrada
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert J Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
