US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 184
Black + Gold Corporation v. Solomon Acquisitions, LLC
as 3:2022cv00310
Defendant:
Solomon Acquisitions, LLC and Threadfellows, LLC
Plaintiff:
Black + Gold Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cifo, Sandra v. APG Media of Wisconsin, LLC
as 3:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sandra Cifo
Defendant:
APG Media of Wisconsin, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Ansys, Inc. v. Strand Associates, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00760
Plaintiff:
Ansys, Inc.
Defendant:
Strand Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Caso, Chad v. Olson, Tyrone et al
as 3:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Chad Caso
Defendant:
Tyrone Olson, Edgardo Casillas and Jorge Casillas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Vidyashev, Igor v. Midwest Communications, Inc
as 3:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Igor Vidyashev
Defendant:
Midwest Communications, Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Tomelleri, Joseph v. Currier's Lakeview Lodge, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Tomelleri
Defendant:
Currier's Lakeview Lodge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hutson, Robin v. Midwest-Southeastern Equipment Dealers Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01019
Plaintiff:
Robin Hutson
Defendant:
Midwest-Southeastern Equipment Dealers Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wright, Jon v. Namakagon Lake Association, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00956
Defendant:
Namakagon Lake Association, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jon Q. Wright
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Vogts, Brandon v. Parr Interactive, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00936
Defendant:
Parr Interactive, LLC and Matthew Breen
Plaintiff:
Brandon Vogts
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Carmel Capital, LLC v. Commercial Recreation Specialists, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00796
Defendant:
Commercial Recreation Specialists, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carmel Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
