US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gadzinski, Philip v. Belile, Doug et al
as 3:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Gadzinski
Defendant:
Doug Belile, Joel Schirek, Amy Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNulty, Ned v. Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
as 3:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kayser, Christian v. Hughes, Jason et al
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Christian Roth Kayser
Defendant:
Jason Hughes and Modou Ngum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall, Philip v. Curran, Paul
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Philip Marshall
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Paul Curran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Almond, Dwayne v. Sabenson et al
as 3:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Almond
Defendant:
Sabenson, Capt. - Ms. Jones, Capt. - Mr. Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krueger, Troy v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Troy Allen Krueger
Defendant:
Gregory J. Van Ryroek and Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon, John v. Mendota Mental Health Institution
as 3:2021cv00225
Defendant:
Mendota Mental Health Institution
Plaintiff:
John T. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upthegrove, James v. Mendota Medical Directors et al
as 3:2020cv00975
Defendant:
Dr. Knutson, Dr. Ann, Mendota Medical Directors and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Upthegrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choi, Young v. Rustad, Sarah
as 3:2020cv00953
Plaintiff:
Young Jae Choi
Defendant:
Sarah Rustad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upthegrove, James v. MMHI Medical Director et al
as 3:2020cv00927
Defendant:
MMHI Medical Director, Marv, MMHI Kelly Ragran and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Upthegrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
