US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
United States of America for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Provision Contracting Services, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Provision Contracting Services, LLC, Nicholas Dowdell and United States Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Site Pros, LLC v. United States Fire Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: United States of America and The United States of America, for the use of Site Pros, LLC
Defendant: United States Fire Insurance Company and Provision Contracting Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Provision Contracting Services, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00684
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Defendant: Provision Contracting Services, LLC and United States Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of HCR Construction Inc. v. SES Civil and Environmental LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00621
Plaintiff: United States of America and United States of America for the use and benefit of HCR Construction Inc.
Defendant: SES Civil and Environmental LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Howell, LLC et al v. Carothers Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00406
Defendant: Carothers Construction, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Howell, LLC and United States of America, for the use and benefit of Howell, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Howell, LLC et al v. Carothers Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00402
Defendant: Carothers Construction, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Howell, LLC, Howell, LLC and United States of America, for the use and benefit of Howell, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Inviro Design & Consulting, LLC et al v. Carothers Constructions, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00325
Defendant: Iota Commerical Solutions, LLC, Carothers Constructions, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Inviro Designs & Consulting, LLC and United States of America for the use and benefit of Inviro Design & Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of Dixie Acoustical Contractors, Inc. v. Provision Contracting Services, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00200
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of Dixie Acoustical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant: Developers Surety and Indemnity Company and Provision Contracting Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and Benefit of CTI Consultants, Inc. et al v. Carothers Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00004
Plaintiff: CTI Consultants, Inc. and United States of America for the use and Benefit of CTI Consultants, Inc.
Defendant: Carothers Construction, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of Peach State Roofing, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00339
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of Peach State Roofing, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?