US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,138
Dawson et al v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dawson and Timothy Weakley
Defendant:
Lauderdale County, State of Alabama, Lauderdale County Revenue Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Combs et al v. Staggs et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bradley Combs
Defendant:
Timothy Staggs, Timothy Weakley, Hannah Weakley Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Woods v. Account Resolution Corporation
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Rotesia Woods
Defendant:
Account Resolution Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnston v. InDebted USA Inc
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Tia DeCoito Johnston
Defendant:
InDebted USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Conrad v. Holloway Credit Solutions LLC
as 4:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad
Defendant:
Holloway Credit Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Conrad v. Camping World Holdings Inc
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad
Defendant:
Camping World Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 ta - Telecommunications Act of 1996
Moore v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Diamond Moore
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Z.P. et al v. Bryant
as 7:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Z. P., A. W. and M. L.
Defendant:
Errol Gregory Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
