US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,132
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Arc Realty LLC
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J Arko and Andrew M Moore
Defendant:
Arc Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hitt v. Frost-Arnett Company Inc
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hitt
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Alabama and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc and D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hill et al v. Warren Averett LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mildred Susan Hill and Bryan Hirsch
Defendant:
Warren Averett LLC, Warren Averett Companies LLC, Mary Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Chen v. Burttram & Henderson
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Chao Chen
Defendant:
Burttram & Henderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TitleMax of Alabama Inc v. Hambright et al
as 7:2021cv01602
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
