US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,336
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bullington v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00084
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Beasley v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00085
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Abernathy v. US Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2025cv00068
Defendant:
US Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Logan C Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Simon et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2025cv00067
Defendant:
J. Steven Roy, Mike Brock, Myla E. Calhoun and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Luna, Sydney Testman, Richard Fording and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marsh v. Little River Transportation LLC et al
as 1:2025cv00076
Defendant:
Devin Dean and Little River Transportation LLC
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Velez v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 2:2025cv00052
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Velez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rogers et al v. England et al
as 2:2025cv00037
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers, Donald Joe Barbor and Patience Wallace
Defendant:
John England, Jr., Sherri Burns, Pamela Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
