US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 255
United States of America v. Currency
as 2:2011cv02451
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. U.S. Currency ($1,268,381.96)
as 1:2011cv01951
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
United States Currency
Claimant:
Edward M. Hindman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Currency
as 7:2011cv01915
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Claimant:
John Curtis Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Currency, $71,030.00
as 2:2011cv01689
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Claimant:
Shaheer Fara
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Automobile
as 2:2011cv01320
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Automobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $153,436.67
as 1:2011cv01279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$153,436.67
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Currency
as 2:2011cv01156
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Claimant:
Jabari Mosley
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Currency et al
as 2:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency and Automobile
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Currency
as 5:2010cv00984
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Claimant:
American Recyling, Inc. and Fananda Crowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00952
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency
Claimant:
Ally Financial Inc. , Robert A. Morgan, Trustee , Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
