US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,663
Dixon v. Morris-Shea Bridge Company Inc
as 2:2021cv01110
Plaintiff:
John Braxton Dixon
Defendant:
Morris-Shea Bridge Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Town v. Tidwell Group LLC
as 2:2021cv00995
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Town
Defendant:
Tidwell Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Powell et al v. James Paving Co LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00991
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Powell, John Coleman and Micques Thomas
Defendant:
James Paving Co LLC and Larry James
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cahill v. Red Clay Technology Group Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
Chris Cahill
Defendant:
Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr and Damon Porrill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nowell v. Felder Services LLC
as 2:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Devarrion Nowell
Defendant:
Felder Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Church v. Cerro Wire LLC
as 5:2021cv00988
Plaintiff:
Christopher Church
Defendant:
Cerro Wire LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stewart et al v. Red Mountain Retail Inc
as 2:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Patricia Stewart and Larry Luckey
Defendant:
Red Mountain Retail Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wade v. Tricon Wear Solutions LLC
as 2:2021cv00934
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wade
Defendant:
Tricon Wear Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Goins v. J'S Ace Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
Uniqua Goins
Defendant:
Robin McClain LLC an Alabama Limited Liability Company doing business as Empire Gentlemen's Club, Robin McClain, J'S Ace Inc an Alabama Corporation doing business as Empire Gentleman's Club and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vines v. TA Operating LLC
as 7:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Brenda Vines
Defendant:
TA Operating LLC doing business as Travel Centers of America doing business as Petro doing business as Iron Skillet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
