US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 491
Kimble-Foster v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and Crowne Management, LLC Welfare Benefit Plan
Plaintiff:
Arvie Kimble-Foster
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Frioux v. Washington County Hospital and Nursing Home
as 1:2024mc00005
Plaintiff:
Hope Frioux
Defendant:
Washington County Hospital and Nursing Home
Cobb v. Unum Group Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation, Unum Provident Corporation, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cobb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Southern Company Employee Savings Plan v. Costa et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
The Southern Company Employee Savings Plan
Counter Claimant:
Mary Robin Costa
Defendant:
Brandi Costa Nolen
Cross Defendant:
Southern Company Employee Savings Plan Committee Southern Company Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Norwood v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jannitha Norwood
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Downey v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Downey
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
White v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Shawn White
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zirlott v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zirlott
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kemp v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
George Kemp
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
