Alabama Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 8,817
Young v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joe G. Young
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bento v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bento
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haywood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2025cv00306
Plaintiff:
Maketa S Haywood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2025cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jason Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2025cv00282
Plaintiff:
Isaac Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Powell v. Dudek (CONSENT)

as 2:2025cv00141
Plaintiff:
Glenn Wendell Powell
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Turk v. Dudek (CONSENT)
as 3:2025cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tonya Turk
Defendant:
Lee Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Calhoun v. Dudek (CONSENT)
as 1:2025cv00132
Plaintiff:
Holious Calhoun, Jr.
Defendant:
Lee Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Day v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
William Day
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kon v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2025cv00203
Plaintiff:
Louanne Kon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.